In the courtroom, ambiguity is the enemy of justice. When legislators pass vague, far-reaching laws, they do more than sow confusion—they erode the integrity of the judicial process. When statutes are written without precision, judges are forced to guess at legislative intent, apply the law inconsistently, and preside over prosecutions that have no home in a just system like ours.
That’s why it’s important to take a hard look at Louisiana’s Senate Bill 154, which criminalizes the possession and distribution of all kratom products—natural and synthetic alike—without distinction, without nuance, and without regard for science or fairness.
This kind of dangerous oversimplification is a breeding ground for legal overreach. The assumption that all kratom products—regardless of form or composition—pose the same risk and therefore warrant the same punishment is a premise that collapses under even modest scrutiny.
This kind of wholesale criminalization is also at stark odds with a growing national consensus — including among many Republicans — that our drug laws have often done more harm than good. From the harsh policies of the 1970s through the 1990s, we saw generations of men – a large number of them Black and Hispanic — imprisoned for non-violent drug offenses that might have been better addressed with probation, drug treatment, or other solutions that are community based. Even President Trump has acknowledged the need for reform, signing legislation in his first term to reduce mandatory minimums and seek alternatives to incarceration. Senate Bill 154 ignores that progress — and runs the risk of repeating the mistakes of the past.
Natural kratom is a plant native to Southeast Asia, used for centuries as a traditional remedy for its occasional pain-relieving and mood-enhancing properties. In recent years, many Americans—including veterans, chronic pain patients, and individuals recovering from opioid addiction—have turned to it as a natural alternative to pharmaceutical drugs. It’s typically brewed as tea or taken in capsules, often in carefully controlled doses.
The benefits of this natural remedy have been lost in our state’s mad dash to respond to an entirely new breed of synthetic drugs disguised as kratom now driving a so-called fourth wave of the opioid epidemic.
These synthetic products aren’t natural remedies—they’re kratom on steroids. They’re cooked up in labs, often mixed with other chemicals, and sold in blister packs at gas stations and convenience stores. Some have been found to be dozens of times more potent than morphine. It’s no wonder they’ve earned the nickname “gas station heroin”—they’ve been linked to fatal overdoses, addiction, and a host of serious health risks. And unlike regulated health products, they rarely include proper labels, dosage instructions, or any guarantee of safety.
Herein lies a critical error—an essential distinction must be made between natural kratom leaf and the dangerous knockoffs sold at many foreign-owned gas stations and convenience stores. Casting a wide and indiscriminate net entangling law-abiding citizens in the same legal jeopardy as those dealing in dangerous, adulterated substances is a crime in and of itself.
Only one thing can result from this kind of short-sighted legislation landing in a courtroom: a betrayal of the very principles our legal system is meant to uphold. Treating a veteran seeking relief with natural kratom the same as someone pushing dangerous, synthetic knockoffs isn’t justice—it’s a precarious, consequential, perversion of it.
That’s not just worrisome for natural kratom users. Laws like SB 154 create an enormous burden on Louisiana’s legal system. Our courts are already stretched thin handling serious offenses—violent crimes, drug trafficking, cases where there is clear intent to harm. Diverting resources to prosecute working-class individuals, veterans, or pain patients for possessing a plant they believed was legal last week is a misallocation of time, money, and moral clarity.
SB 154 also suffers from troubling vagueness around what qualifies as “kratom.” When the law fails to define the lines, judges are left to draw them. That’s not just poor drafting—it’s a due process issue. Citizens have a right to know what’s legal and what isn’t. When they can’t tell the difference, enforcement becomes arbitrary and public trust in the legal system erodes.
Then there’s the issue of criminal intent—or the lack thereof. In most cases, those charged under this bill will not be hardened criminals. They will be individuals who believed they were purchasing or using a lawful product. And yet, if the Governor ignorantly signs this legislation, they’ll face prosecution and a criminal record just the same.
We’ve seen similar overreaches before. Earlier this year, the legal community raised serious concerns about a proposal to hand lawmakers new authority over Louisiana’s court system—another sweeping change that would have compromised the integrity of judicial decision-making. This bill reflects the same pattern: an effort to appear tough on drugs without considering the long-term consequences for the courts, for justice, and for the people of this state.
There’s a better way. Seventeen other states have adopted regulations that allow for the sale of natural kratom under strict guidelines under the Kratom Consumer Protection Act (KCPA): age restrictions, labeling requirements, and product testing to ensure there are no adulterants or synthetic ingredients. This model strikes a balance—protecting consumers without pushing vulnerable people toward more dangerous options.
Laws should be clear, evidence-based, and enforceable. SB 154 is none of those things. If signed into law in its current form, it will leave judges with no choice but to enforce a deeply flawed statute—and that’s not a position anyone upholding the pillars of our justice system should ever find themselves cornered.
We can protect public health without criminalizing honest behavior. But only if we take the time to get the law right. If this looks like justice to you Governor, I urge you to take a closer look at your definition.
Recommended For You.
Be the first to comment